The assistant superintendent of police who was found guilty of wounding a civilian, was given just over a year to pay a quarter of a million dollars to the victim at his sentencing hearing yesterday. While paying restitution will spare ASP Everton Francis jail time, his future in the force hangs in the balance.
Francis must pay $70,000 of the $250,000 to Damien Watson, who was paralysed by his bullet, on or before the last working day in August. Failure to do so will result in a four-year prison term.
The officer, who was found guilty after a High Court trial, must then pay $45,000 by the last working day in November. A three-year sentence would be imposed if he defaults.
The balance of $135,000 must be paid in three installments of $45,000 at the end of February 2011, May 2011 and August 2011. Default on any of the installments would result in confinement.
Asked yesterday if officers would assist Francis, Chairman of the Police Welfare Association Corporal Ray John said, up to that point, he was not aware of his colleague’s fate.
He said, however, that the PWA would have to discuss the matter and that the organisation has a history of providing financial assistance to members.
But whether ASP Francis will remain a member of the force is another matter.
Commissioner of Police Thomas Bennett told The Daily OBSERVER that once an officer with rank from inspector upwards is found guilty of a criminal offence, it is the commissioner’s duty to recommend that officer’s dismissal to the Public Service Commission (PSC).
ASP Francis will remain on suspension while the PSC deliberates.
During yesterday’s court proceedings, Justice Errol Thomas who presided over the case told the accused, “All evidence of payment must be presented to the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions.”
The judge said the offence carries a maximum of five years in jail with or without hard labour. However, he said he would use the Probation Act to guide him in deciding the form of punishment best suited.
Justice Thomas said he was “deeply concerned” by the fact that the victim is 28 years old and is paralysed “in the legs and trunk.”
“I will give you a non-custodial sentence,” he told Francis, “not because of what the community has said about you, but because of that young man, who shows intelligence and gave good evidence and can never be able to make a living the way he would have wanted to. It’ll carve out a new method for him to earn. But this doesn’t prevent him still doing otherwise.”
The judge’s latter statement referred to comments by the police officer’s lawyer, Ralph Francis, who, in asking for leniency for his client, suggested that the victim could file a civil suit to seek compensation.
“What struck me was that Mr Watson passed you and your colleague and he said good evening and you both replied and then he went under a streetlight. He did not disguise nor did he hide in a dark place; he went under a streetlight and this was about 7 pm. Notwithstanding your zeal to rid your community of criminals, your heart and conscience must have told you he is no criminal,” the judge said to the accused during the sentencing.
A social inquiry report portrayed Francis as a man deeply involved with community work, including surveillance, and as someone meticulous in executing his duties.
Residents from Jennings where Francis has lived for a long time said the officer’s vigilance made them feel safe.
Attorney John Fuller, who was a character witness, said, “The ASP is not a bad egg.”
The senior officer went on trial this month for wounding Watson with intent to do him grievous bodily harm. But on July 7, the 12-member jury found him not guilty of that charge and guilty of the lesser count of unlawful wounding. ASP Francis was placed on remand until sentencing yesterday.
The officer committed the crime on March 2, 2007 in Jennings.
Watson testified that he went to visit his ex-girlfriend in Jennings when he saw Francis, who was dressed in civilian clothes, and another man looking under the bonnet of a car.
The young man said he passed the two, exchanging salutations, before he stopped under a streetlight.
Watson said Francis approached him and asked what he was doing there.
Told that he was waiting for someone, the victim said the cop continued to probe the reason for his presence in the village. Watson said he then invited the officer to wait with him.
The paralysed man said the officer walked off and shortly after that he felt someone grab his hands from behind the lamppost, and when he turned around he saw Francis with the gun in his hand, which he discharged.



Twitter
Facebook








Everton, if you are innocent of the charges, take your prison sentence and don’t pay him a cent. From Korea, take care of yourself.
Now the evidence speaks for itself, I’m under a street light, I come up to you from behind a lamppost and discharge my weapon. I was showing no form of misconduct, but still attacked (quoting from the evidence at hand)….this is more than evidence to charge the officer in question. The police force must be made to understand that not because they are the law, they are not above the law. Many have been bypassed and many more will come, because they think that they will always get an easy break. I support you 100% Justice Thomas, if you weren’t a logical man, no good would have come out of this misfortune. This is a lesson to both police officers and the regular man on the street. Don’t let this happen to you. Use your judgment thinking before attacking.
jesus be with you
officer Francis, the judge refer to your sentence as a way for the victim to earn a living. if i were you i would take the sentence which cannot be more than five years and not pay this criminal a cent !!!!1
all of us, at some point in life will get lucky with money some way or the other. use it wisley build your self a home son
He should have been convicted on the first charge or wounding with intent but that’s impossible in this “toon town.” im suprised his fellow officers even managed to bring any kind of charge against him. Look at the first blog, such is the mind set of officers in “toon town,”
During the case, the victim’s girl friend testified that she got to the scene right after hearing shots & met the officer there with the gun in his hand. She, further, testified, that he then left & later, returned with a cutlass which he left on the scene-in an attempt to forge the CRIME scene. NONE of this testimony was taken into account, by the judge nor jury! Why was it not?
A young man iws now paralysed, from the waist down- a young man who the offices MUST have seen hundreds of times, in that same area, because he (the officer) lives on the same street & the girl has lived there & in the general area for years. If he could have held on to him while, as he said, he was being attacked with a cutlas, how come he noh get none cut or evan a scratch?
I hope the victim, now, sues him so hard that he begs to be taken to prison, for life, instead!
was justice served?
was justice served?
With the big haul of cocaine they had this week then the police should not have any problem paying the fine.
Lloyd I thought you would’ve been out of Korea by now.